Library
|
2.1. As a follow up of the recommendations of Justice Ranganath Misra
Commission of Inquiry, the Administration of the Union Territory of
Delhi with the approval of the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of
India, constituted two committees viz. (i) Committee consisting of
Justice Dalip Kapur, a retired Chief Justice of Delhi High Court and Ms.
Kusum Lata Mittal, a retired Secretary to the Government of India - to
enquire into the conduct of Delhi Police during the October- November,
1984 riots and (ii) Committee consisting of Justice M.L. Jain, a retired
Judge of Delhi High Court and Sh. E.N. Renison, a retired IPS officer (
later on replaced with Sh. A.K. Banerji, a retired IPS officer) - to
examine cases relating to riots in Delhi during October-November, 1984
vide Orders/ Notification No. F./P.S/H.S./87/1127-1244 dated the 23rd
February, 1987.
2.2 These two Committees started functioning with effect form 23rd
February, 1987. The committee consisting of Justice Dalip K Kapur and
Ms. Kusum Lata Mital submitted their reports to the Administrator of the
Union Territory of Delhi in February,1990. The functioning of the other
Committee consisting of Justice M.L. Jain - Sh. A.K. Banerji, which is
relevant for the purpose of this Report, needs to be described in some
greater detail. The terms of reference of this committee, as laid down
in the foresaid Notification, reads as under:-
Whereas a number of deaths occurred and a number of grave offences were
committed in various incidents of rioting following the assassination of
late Prime Minister, Smt. Indira Gandhi on 31st October,1984. And
whereas allegations have been made that cases relating to criminal
offences were either not registered or were not properly investigated
and followed up by the Police and Government agencies concerned. Now,
therefore, in order to have such cases properly registered, investigated
and followed up the Administrator hereby appoints a Committee consisting
of Justice M.L. Jain, a former Judge of Delhi High Court and Sh. E. N.
Renison, a retired IPS Officer with the following terms of reference;
-
To examine whether there were cases of omission to register or properly
investigate offences committed in Delhi during the period of riots from
31st October, 1984 to 7th November, 1984.
-
To recommend the registration of cases where necessary and to monitor
the investigation thereof.
-
To monitor the conduct of investigation and the follow up of cases
already registered by the police and to suggest steps for effective
action including fresh and further investigation, where necessary.
-
To perform any other function in addition to the above
The Administration hereby authorizes the Committee to look into any
papers related thereto and to give such instructions or advice as it
deems necessary to the Police and the Prosecution Agency relating to
registration, investigation and Prosecution of such cases.
The Administration is further pleased to direct that the Committee will
give a monthly report of the progress of its work to the Administrator.
The Committee will function for a period of six months.
By order and in the name of the
Administrator of the Union Territory of Delhi
Sd/-
(K.K. Bhasin)
Joint Secretary (Home)
2.3. The Committee started functioning from Vigyan
Bhawan Annexe in March, 1987 but had to make way for Justice Thakkar
Commission of Inquiry and consequently shifted its office to an
accommodation provided under the Orders of the Lt. Governor of Delhi, in
D.D.A. Building, Vikas Minar, New Delhi - 110 002 in June, 1987.
2.4. The Committee relied mainly on the affidavits
filed before Justice Ranganath Misra Commission of Inquiry and picked up
669 affidavits which were relevant for the purpose of inquiry. The
Committee through a Public Notice published in the leading National
Dailies of Delhi in 1987 invited affidavits from the persons acquainted
with the subject matter of the Inquiry. 415 affidavits were received by
the Committee form the affected persons and their family members.
2.5. On the basis of one such affidavit filed by Smt.
Anwar Kaur, a victim of October-November, 1984 riots the Committee wrote
a letter No. JJC/F.8/(67)/789 dated the 14 October, 1987 to the
Additional Commissioner of Police, Delhi. It was pointed out that the
contents of the affidavit disclosed the Commission of cognizable
offences against Sh. Sajjan Kumar, Sh. Nathu Pardhan, Sh. Brahma Nand
Gupta, Sh. Udel, Sh. Rajinder, Sh. Pearia, Sh. Hanuman and Sh. Sis Ram
Halwai under Section 143,147,148, 149, 320, 435, 436, 455, 201 & 114
I.P.C. and requested him that the F.I.R. in this regard may be
registered at Police Station Sultanpuri and cases investigated
immediately, and the copy of the F.I.Rs. may be sent to this Committee.
The Additional Commissioner of Police, Delhi wrote a reply dated the
16th October, 1987 in which it was stated that the letter dated the 14th
October, 1987 of this Committee should be routed through the Delhi
Administration, Delhi. To this letter a reply dated the 19th July
October, 1987 was sent by the Secretary to the Commission. It was stated
therein that by virtue of the Notification appointing the Committee, the
Administrator of the Union Territory of Delhi had authorized the
Committee to give instructions/ advice to the Police and the Prosecuting
Agencies relating to registration/investigation and prosecution of such
like cases. In view thereof there was no need to write the said letter
through Delhi Administration as it would only delay the process of
registration and investigation of such serious offences. After the
aforesaid communication was sent by the Committee, a Writ Petition (C.W.P
3337 of 1987) was filed in November/December, 1987 by Braham Nand Gupta
and Others in the High Court of Delhi. Vide order dated 24th November,
1987 Rule Nisi was issued and by an Interim Injunction, the Respondents
No. 4 & 5 (Justice M.L. Jain and Sh. A.K. Banerji ) were restrained from
making recommendations for registration of fresh cases and it was
further directed that no further case should be registered on the
directions/ orders of the said Respondents No ‘4’ & ‘5’.
2.6. After receipt of the Interim Injunction,
directions/orders of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, the work of the
Committee virtually came to a stand-still. The Committee, however pursed
the matter with the Delhi Administration to contest the Writ Petition
and get the Interim Injunction vacated as early as possible. However,
the Interim Injunction continued for about two years i.e. from 24th
November, 1987 to 4th October, 1989 till the final order / Judgment was
delivered by Justice B.N. Kirpal and C.L. Choudhary on 4th October,
1989.
|