Library
|
All thought the period from October 31 to November 4 - the heights of
the riots the police all over the city uniformly betrayed a common
behavioural pattern marked by (I) total absence from the scene; or (ii)
a role of passive spectators or (iii) direct participation or abetment
in the orgy of violence against the Sikhs. On November 1, when we toured
the Lajpat Nagar area we found the police conspicuous by their absence
while Sikh's shop were being set on fire and looted. Young people armed
with swords, daggers, spears, steel trishuls and iron rods were ruling
the roads. The only sign of police presence was a police jeep, which
obstructed a peace procession brought out a few concerned citizens (who
later organised themselves into the Nagarik Ekta manch) on the evening
of November 1, When the procession was on its way to the Lajpat Nagar
main market, a police inspector from the van stopped the procession,
warned it not to proceed reminding its members that the city was under
curfew and Section 144. When leaders of the procession wanted to know
from the police inspector why the arsonists and rioters were not being
dispersed if curfew was on, he gave no reply and warned instead that
the processionists could go to the Lajpat Nagar market at their own risk.
At the Lajpat Nagar market, leaders of the procession sought to pacify
the mob by pointing out that innocent Sikhs were not responsible for
Mrs. Gandhi's assassination and should be protected from the attacks.
They raised the slogan: "Hindu-Sikh bhai bhai" As the crowd began to
listen to the speeches made by the procession leaders, organised
attempts were made by certain groups from among them to shout down the
speakers, by raising the slogans:- "Indira Gandhi Zindabad" "Hindi
Hindi bhai bhai". It is significant that wherever we went, we did not
find any sign of mourning or grief on the faces of those who were
participating in the looting and burning. Attempts of pacify them by the
peace marchers were met with derisive laughter. Listening to their
gleeful faces, one would have thought it was a festival, but for the
arson and loot that was going on.
In the resettlement colonies, the police came out from their passive
role and directly participated in the violence against the Sikhs. We
were told by survivors that at the first signs of tension those who felt
threatened personally went to the nearby police stations to seek their
intervention. But the police did not respond. In Trilokpuri, the police
reportedly accompanied the arsonists and provided them with diesel from
their jeeps. The Station Hours Officer (SHO) of Kalyanpuri police
station under which Trilokpuri falls, withdrew the constables who were
on duty there when action against the SHO and his two colleagues by
suspending and arresting them for a criminal negligence of duties. In
Sultanpuri, the SHO, one Bhatti, is alleged to have killed two Sikhs and
helped the mob in disarming those Sikhs who tried to resist the mob.
Several residents of Loni Road in the trans-Jamuna area, who were
camping at Shakarpur when we interviewed them on November 7, told us
that the police announced on loudspeakers two or three times at night on
November 1 that they would not be responsible for the safety of the
Sikhs and that the latter must look after themselves. One women from the
same area said she had seen a police jeep full of men and that the
stoning of Sikh shops was conducted from the jeep. Another resident from
the same road said that the police had incited the looting of a watch
shop before it was burnt.
In Kotla Mubarkpur, a domestic worker told our team members that the
police had encouraged the looting. Later they were reported to have said
to the looters; " We gave you 36 hours. Had we given the Sikhs that
amount of time, they would have killed every Hindu"
In the Kingsway Camp, residents claimed that seventy percent of the loot
was to be found in the police lines, suggesting that the police took a
leading role in the plundering.
When after this destruction and murders, people went to complain and
file FIR's the police in many areas refused to record their complaints,
according to information gathered from the Hindu neighbours of the
victims. A respected Sikh professional whose house was burned on 1st
November was not able to register an F.I.R. despite all efforts. In
Mangolpuri we were told, a police officer asked the Hindu complainants
why they were protecting Sikhs and advised them to look after safety of
Hindus. Typical was the experience of Dharam Raj Pawar and Rajvir Pawar
- two residents of Ber Sarai - who on November 1, went to the sector IV
R.K. Puram Police station to ask for protection of Sikh family (which
till then was being sheltered by Hindu neighbours from impending attack
by a mob led by a Congress (I) man, Jagdish Tokas) The officer in charge
of the police station reportedly told them that he could not offer any
help. Two constables later said to them, "You being Jats should have
killed those Sikhs. What are you doing here ? Don't you know a train has
arrived from Punjab carrying bodies of Massacred Hindus?"
A few individual police officials who did try to intervene and stop the
riots found their efforts frustrated primarily through lack of
co-operation from the top. One senior officer told us that when on
October 31 and November 1 be received reports about some 3000 to 3000
people moving around the city in scooters and motorcycles without
helmets, he contacted the CID seeking information from them regarding
the identity of these people. Till November 7, when we met him, he had
not received any report from the CID.
While analysing the role of the police during the crucial period we can
not afford to ignore the responsibility of those in position of
authority at the top, namely the Home Ministry. The Home Minister, Mr.
Narasimha Rao who was inducted in the new Cabinet by Prime Minister
Rajiv Gandhi soon after Mrs. Gandhi's death, was empowered in his
capacity as a Home Minister to deploy the para-military forces ( if the
Delhi Police force was found to be inadequate or inefficient) to quell
the violence that erupted following the announcement of Mrs. Gandhi's
death. Mr Rao is not a new incumbent who is an aware of the procedural
technicalities. We are left with the question : why did Mr. Rao, with
his past experience as a Home Minister in the previous cabinet, fail to
take the necessary steps and summon the forces available to him to nip
in the bud the communal elements that organised the riots?
|