Library
|
As stated in earlier chapters, because of the highly professional nature
of the massacre, it is very hard to prove the identity of the criminals,
both who were on and off the scene. The only eye-witnesses, who are
holding on to the memory of what and who they saw executing those
crimes, are, the immediate families of the victims. Fourteen years
later, perhaps, there is a question mark even on that. Not only because
memory can fade with time and pain but also because some of the
eyewitnesses may be too traumatised to come out with everything that
happened to them. For instance, hundreds of young girls and women were
gang-raped but none has even spoken about it. Rape, despite the rate at
which it takes place in India and despite no rapist in the country
having ever got more than two years behind bars, is, officially, still
considered a crime. Besides, some eyewitnesses were very young at the
time and their memory is lost in the cycle of time.
Life expectancy in India is not high and it goes
without saying that the poor and the sick die quite young. In millions
of cases they never live to be young. The survivors of the massacre,
with wounds in their hearts that will stop bleeding only with their last
breaths, cantons be expected to live much longer. In fact, hundreds of
old men and women who saw their young sons being brutally killed are
already dead. One hundred and seventeen young women who witnessed those
spine-chilling killings (whom I knew personally due to my involvement in
the relief work) committed suicide.
Thousand of others have nothing to live for, nobody
to turn to. Words like "keep faith in God," draw a blank from them.
There is really no language to describe their pain and poverty.
The point to underline here is that the surviving
eyewitnesses must be heard before it is too late. Already, there is a
dearth of proof that can withstand a legal investigation. What is there
is too precious to be lost.
|