Self-Determination as a Human Right and its application to the Sikhs
This paper identifies that self-determination claims are not just
founded in international law but
that self-determination is in fact a basic human right on which other
human rights depend and
whose implementation is a duty of the international community.
Despite becoming a cornerstone of international law, some commentators
contend that self determination
claims are something purely within the realms of politics. In addition,
there is the
vilification of proponents of self-determination, often perpetrated by
states like India, which results
in self-determination activists being labelled extremists or even
terrorists.
Furthermore, this paper aims to provide the reasoned basis for the
international community
recognising and defending the application of self-determination to the
Sikhs. By doing that the
international community is not committing itself to any particular
outcome – that is something for
the Sikhs and the process of international law to determine – but it
will take a principled stand
based on the rule of law and that, in itself, will be a substantial
contribution to resolving the Punjab
conflict in a peaceful, just and lawful manner.
Self-Determination is key to world peace
The global reality of our times is that most of the armed conflicts at
the moment are between
groups in a state or between a group and the state - not between states
themselves. Most of these
conflicts involve both a “collective” struggle for
freedom/liberation/autonomy but also systematic
violations of “individual” human rights such as genocide and other
crimes against humanity, such
as extra-judicial killings, disappearances, torture, rape and illegal
detention.
Thus resolutions of these armed conflicts - and of those which are not
yet armed conflicts - WILL
depend on decisions concerning the right of self-determination; the
nexus between the exercise of
self-determination and respect for individual human rights should
therefore be apparent to
all (In India alone there are such conflicts in Kashmir, Panjab,
Nagaland, Manipur, Assam and
other regions).
The importance of self-determination in the geo-political global
landscape is especially crucial in South
Asia which hosts the greatest concentration of self-determination based
claims and the greatest risk
of the use of weapons of mass destruction amid a nuclear weapons race in
the region. The
possibility of a humanitarian catastrophe has been widely recognised:
-
In March 2000 US President Bill Clinton referred to this region as
“the most dangerous
place in the world”. There followed a year long “eyeball to eyeball”
military standoff on
the Indo-Pak border in 2002/3 and despite recent attempts at
normalisation, the risk of a
disastrous conflict is still unacceptably high.
-
In September 2003, while addressing the UN General Assembly,
Pakistan's President,
General Pervez Musharraf, referred to the dispute over Kashmir, a
dispute which the UN
has recognised as essentially a matter of self determination when it
called for a plebiscite
back in 1948. The President called it the “world's most dangerous
dispute” - a reference
to the nuclear weapons both countries possess.
The future of world peace will depend on a proper treatment of these
claims for collective rights.
This paper will, inter alia, show how the international law of
self-determination provides the
essential key to peaceful conflict resolution. A UNESCO sponsored
conference of legal experts
held in Barcelona in 1998 concluded that self-determination, as a right
that is exercised by
democratic means would be a major contribution to the prevention and
resolution of conflicts. It
made clear that link with individual human rights and called upon the
international community to
act: “Peace cannot exist in states that lack legitimacy or whose
governments threaten the lives or
well being of a section of the population. The international community,
its members and
institutions have an obligation to act where international law,
including human rights and
especially the right to self-determination is violated” [ http:/www.unescoat.org].
Legal Obligations
It is important to recognise that self-determination is now an
established legal right and that all
states are obliged to respect that right. Art.(3) of both the
International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights 1966 (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights 1966 (ICESCR) provides that every State has
This paper will describe how self-determination has, especially since
the establishment of the UN,
been central to the development of international law.
|